
Efficacy in Previously Untreated
Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
in Combination with CVP*
Proven to Prolong Progression-Free Survival With Up to 8 Cycles of R-CVP*
The Marcus (M39021) study was a Phase III multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of RITUXAN+CVP in previously untreated, advance-stage, follicular NHL.
*CVP is a chemotherapy regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone.

† Percentages are based on calculations
Patients were randomized to receive either 8 three-week cycles of RITUXAN+CVP 375 mg/m2 given on Day 1 (n=162) or 8 three-week cycles of CVP alone (n=160).‡[1,2]

†IWF: International Working Formulation.
‡One patient who was randomized to the CVP arm did not receive study treatment.
Patients showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with up to 8 cycles of R-CVP[1,2]

- R-CVP improved median PFS by 71% (2.4 years for R-CVP vs 1.4 years for CVP alone), with a median follow-up of 18 months [1,2]
- R-CVP improved 2-year PFS by a relative improvement of 80% (63% for R-CVP vs 35% for CVP alone), with a median follow-up of 18 months [1]
- R-CVP improved median PFS by 127% (2.83 years for R-CVP vs 1.25 years for CVP alone), with a median follow-up of 53 months [3]
§One patient assigned to the CVP group did not receive any trial medication because the patient withdrew consent.
RITUXAN with CVP yielded significant improvement over CVP alone across a wide range of patient subgroups [1]

CI=Confidence interval. FLIPI=Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. Bulky disease is defined as any lesion with a diameter >7 cm. Depicted are the univariate hazard rations (HRs) for R-CVP relative to CVP alone, the 95% CI for the HR, and the sample size (n) in each subgroup. The square represents the HR, and the horizontal bar represents the 95% CI. The area of each subgroup is proportional to the number of patients in the subgroup. The dashed vertical line shows the HR for PFS (0.44) in the overall population.[1]
Most frequent adverse reactions observed in the Marcus study
The following adverse reactions, regardless of severity, were reported more frequently (>5%) in patients receiving R-CVP compared to CVP aline: rash (17% vs 5%), cough (15% vs 6%), flushing (14% vs 3%), rigors (10 vs 2%), pruritus (10% vs 1%), neutropenia (8% vs 3%), and chest tightness (7% vs 1%). [2]
![]() |


