Rituxan Rituximab
Take the essential path toward improved survival

For previously untreated diffuse large B-cell, CD20-positive NHL (DLBCL)
in combination with CHOP or other anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens

LNH 98-5 (GELA) Trial

The first combination to extend DLBCL survival since the 1970s

GELA* LNH 98-5 trial: Elderly DLBCL patients4

Chart: GELA* LNH 98-5 trial: Elderly DLBCL patients

Percentages are based on calculations.
*GELA: Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.
In the GELA trial, the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, which ranged from 0 to 3, was derived by assigning 1 point for each of the following risk factors: Ann Arbor Stage III or IV, ECOG performance status >2, and elevated LDH.

  • In the GELA trial, the first Phase III trial to investigate the RITUXAN+CHOP combination, 399 elderly patients were randomized to receive either RITUXAN plus CHOP or CHOP alone as induction therapy3,4
  • Baseline patient characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. An IPI score of 2 or 3 (generally associated with a high risk of treatment failure) was observed in 60% of patients in the R-CHOP arm and 61% of patients in the CHOP arm4,6

GELA protocol3: R-CHOP x8 vs CHOP x8

Chart: GELA protocol3: R-CHOP x8 vs CHOP x8

CHOP dosing frequency and timing (8 cycles q 21 days regardless of early response) were designed to mirror the original clinical trials that established CHOP in DLBCL.7

  • Patients were randomized to receive either 8 three-week cycles of CHOP plus RITUXAN 375 mg/m2 given on Day 1 (n=202) or 8 three-week cycles of CHOP alone (n=197)3

A significant improvement in survival for elderly patients5

GELA overall survival (N=399)1,2

Chart: E4494 overall survival (N=632)47% increase in 7-year OS in GELA trial

  • At 7 years, 47% increase in OS: R-CHOP increased overall survival from 36% to 53% compared with CHOP alone (p=0.0004)1
  • At 5 years, 8 cycles of RITUXAN+CHOP increased OS from 46% to 58% compared with CHOP alone5
  • Eight cycles of RITUXAN+CHOP improved median event-free survival by 164% (2.9 years for R-CHOP vs 1.1 years for CHOP alone with 26-month median follow-up)4,5
Based on patients' characteristics observed in GELA, the lead investigator's opinion was:“The increase in survival observed after eight cycles of CHOP plus rituximab leads us to recommend this combination for elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.”7Coiffier B et al [letter to the editor]. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1830-1831.

Most common adverse reactions in DLBCL clinical trials

The following adverse reactions, regardless of severity, were reported more frequently (>5%) in patients age >60 years receiving R-CHOP as compared to CHOP alone: pyrexia (56% vs 46%), lung disorder (31% vs 24%), cardiac disorder (29% vs 21%), and chills (13% vs 4%).5

View Indication and Safety Information
E4494 (NCI) Trial

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Rituxan® (rituximab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with:

  • Relapsed or refractory, low-grade or follicular, CD20-positive, B-cell NHL as a single agent
  • Previously untreated follicular, CD20-positive, B-cell NHL in combination with CVP chemotherapy
  • Non-progressing (including stable disease), low-grade, CD20-positive B-cell NHL, as a single agent, after first-line CVP chemotherapy
  • Previously untreated diffuse large B-cell, CD20-positive NHL in combination with CHOP or other anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens

BOXED WARNINGS and Additional Important Safety Information

WARNING: FATAL INFUSION REACTIONS, TUMOR LYSIS SYNDROME (TLS), SEVERE MUCOCUTANEOUS REACTIONS, and PROGRESSIVE MULTIFOCAL LEUKOENCEPHALOPATHY (PML)

Infusion Reactions
Rituxan administration can result in serious, including fatal infusion reactions. Deaths within 24 hours of Rituxan infusion have occurred. Approximately 80% of fatal infusion reactions occurred in association with the first infusion. Carefully monitor patients during infusions. Discontinue Rituxan infusion and provide medical treatment for Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions.

Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS)
Acute renal failure requiring dialysis with instances of fatal outcome can occur in the setting of TLS following treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients with Rituxan.

Severe Mucocutaneous Reactions
Severe, including fatal, mucocutaneous reactions can occur in patients receiving Rituxan.

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)
JC virus infection resulting in PML and death can occur in patients receiving Rituxan.

Rituxan has also been associated with fatal hepatitis B reactivation with fulminant hepatitis, other serious viral infections, cardiovascular events, renal toxicity, and bowel obstruction and perforation.

The most common adverse reactions of Rituxan (incidence ≥25%) observed in patients with NHL are infusion reactions, fever, chills, infection, asthenia, and lymphopenia. The incidence of infusion reactions was highest during the first infusion (77%) and decreased with each subsequent infusion. These infusion reactions generally have resolved with slowing or interruption of the infusion and with supportive care.

Indication-Specific Safety

Single Agent Rituxan for Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade or Follicular NHL
The most common adverse reactions of Rituxan (incidence ≥ 25%) observed in patients with relapsed or refractory, low-grade or follicular NHL are infusion reactions, fever, chills, infection, asthenia, and lymphopenia. Respiratory system events were reported in 38% of patients, and 31% reported infectious events. Grade 3 and 4 cytopenias were reported in 48% of patients and included lymphopenia (40%), neutropenia (6%), leukopenia (4%), anemia (3%), and thrombocytopenia (2%).

Rituxan in Combination with CVP for Previously Untreated, Follicular NHL
Patients in the R-CVP arm had higher incidences of infusional toxicity and of neutropenia as compared to those in the CVP arm. The following adverse reactions occurred more frequently (≥5%) in patients receiving R-CVP compared to CVP alone: rash (17% vs 5%), cough (15% vs 6%), flushing (14% vs 3%), rigors (10% vs 2%), pruritus (10% vs 1%), neutropenia (8% vs 3%), and chest tightness (7% vs 1%).

Single Agent Rituxan for Low-Grade NHL, after First-Line CVP Chemotherapy
The following common adverse reactions were reported more frequently (≥5%) in patients receiving Rituxan following CVP compared with those who received no further therapy: fatigue (39% vs 14%), anemia (35% vs 20%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (30% vs 18%), infections (19% vs 9%), pulmonary toxicity (18% vs 10%), hepatobiliary toxicity (17% vs 7%), rash and/or pruritus (17% vs 5%), arthralgia (12% vs 3%), and weight gain (11% vs 4%). Neutropenia was the only Grade 3 or 4 adverse reaction that occurred more frequently (≥2%) in the Rituxan arm compared with those who received no further therapy (4% vs 1%).

Rituxan in Combination with CHOP Chemotherapy for DLBCL
The following adverse reactions, regardless of severity, were reported more frequently (≥5%) in patients age ≥60 years receiving R-CHOP as compared to CHOP alone: pyrexia (56% vs 46%), lung disorder (31% vs 24%), cardiac disorder (29% vs 21%), and chills (13% vs 4%). In the GELA LNH 98-5 study, a review of cardiac toxicity determined that supraventricular arrhythmias or tachycardia accounted for most of the difference in cardiac disorders (4.5% for R-CHOP vs. 1.0% for CHOP).

The following Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently among patients in the R-CHOP arm compared with those in the CHOP arm: thrombocytopenia (9% vs 7%) and lung disorder (6% vs 3%). Other Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions reported more frequently among patients receiving R-CHOP were viral infection (GELA LNH 98-5 study), neutropenia (GELA LNH 98-5 and MInT studies), and anemia (MInT study).

For additional safety information, please see the full prescribing information, including BOXED WARNINGS and Medication Guide.

Attention Healthcare Provider: Provide Medication Guide to patient prior to Rituxan infusions.

References
  1. Coiffier B, Feugier P, Mounier N, et al. Long-term results of the GELA study comparing R-CHOP and CHOP chemotherapy in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma show good survival in poor-risk patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(suppl 18S):443s. Abstract 8009.
  2. Coiffier B, Feugier P, Mounier N, et al. Long-term results of the GELA study comparing R-CHOP and CHOP chemotherapy in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma show good survival in poor-risk patients. Paper presented at: 43rd American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 1-5, 2007; Chicago, Ill. Abstract 8009.
  3. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Brière J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:235-242.
  4. Data on file, Genentech, Inc.
  5. RITUXAN® (Rituximab) full prescribing information, Genentech, Inc., 2008.
  6. The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:987-994.
  7. Coiffier B, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F. Rituximab plus CHOP for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma [letter to the editor]. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1830-1831.